![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ed
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ih=016&sspagename=STRK%3AMEWA%3AIT&viewitem=&item=260115970102&rd=1&rd=1> |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: peter ullman
front looks good...but apparent back damage. I'd say it's authentic for sure...there is a 7 day return policy as well! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Steve f
Nice. Looks trimmed -corners. As Pete said, back damage prevents it from being a "PSA 4". |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Mark T
I bet someone tried to get it graded and it came back "evidence of trim" |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Scot
Bottom right corner looks hooked to me(trim?)on the card in question. Bottom left corner looks very sharp compared to the rest as well. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Joe
Someone should tell this seller to invest in a better camera or scanner. Superior merch photos result in |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Mike Snyder
Why would a card that looks like that (very nice) not get graded?? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: peter ullman
mike...card looks to have been taped somewhere as I see paper loss on atleast 3 of the 4 quadrants! |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Mike
In no way trying to be negative, but the left side corners look pretty darn pointy. Hard to stay that sharp after 74 years. But the photo is fuzzy. But the sharp corners speak loud and clear. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Mark L
email the seller and ask for exact measurements. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Mike
Which city are you in, in Minn. ? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: peter ullman
mike...st paul. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Mike
White Bear. Neighbors. Lunch is on me sometime. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: peter ullman
rock & roll! |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: peter chao
Guys, |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
It would be a bigger red flag if his other vintage cards WERE graded and this one wasn't. If all aren't graded maybe he doesn't like grading companies? |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Steve f
Weird, The Dimaggio is in a gai? slab in the back shot, but not the card front... |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Pennsylvania Ted
In seller's FDBK profile it is obvious that this seller doesn't deal in graded cards. All his recent |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
While it is unquestionably real I think one would be taking some risk buying it. It's already well over $1000, if it grades it's likely to be a 2, and it may not meet size requirements...sorry, but I don't like it. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Strip Card Expert Needed | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 07-03-2006 02:32 PM |
Ruth card opinion | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 11-07-2005 12:07 PM |
Opinion on T206 Card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 10-02-2005 03:42 PM |
Need the help of expert card detectives | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 03-23-2004 08:49 PM |
What is your opinion on this card? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 07-04-2003 05:00 PM |