![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Mike
Dave, for me the #'s 30's and 60's weren't that tough at all. Now, none of my results are very scientific but I concentrated solely on this set for 6 years. I would buy just about anything in my affordable range when they became available(vg). After 5 years and needing my last twenty cards, I needed one #30(Hooper) and one #60(Wagner). However, I needed three #80's and three #90's. Ironically enough, the HOFers seem to be easier to find than some commons. But, with no doubt in my mind, the portrait shots in the first twenty cards are the EASIEST to find. Just my findings. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1914 B18 Blankets question (need help on deadline) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 04-13-2007 02:08 PM |
1914 Baltimore News Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 02-24-2007 02:52 PM |
1914 CrackerJack question??? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 11-21-2005 11:43 AM |
Re: 1914 Cracker Jack question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 10-07-2005 05:46 PM |
1914 Cracker Jack Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 03-07-2005 09:59 PM |