![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: mr. moses
Perhaps a ticket or 19th century ephemera collector might share a bit of information with me. I bought this in mid-1990's at a trade card auction. Ex-Mark Rucker collection I'm pretty sure. I don't imagine there are many earlier examples than this out there, but some people must have a few. It was for a baseball game between two printers, is dated 1867, and features a gold baseball that didn't scan too well. Is it just a trade card announcing an upcoming game or would it have been used in some manner to gain entry to the game.....? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: davidcycleback
Assuming the back is blank and doesn't say "This is a ticket not a trade card," my guess is that it was trade card not a ticket. Tickets usually have admission text ala 'admit one' or 'present at door.' Pre-1870 trade cards, especially color ones, are rare. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: mr. moses
Yes the back is blank, and yes I am 90% sure it is just a trade card (well the "JUST" a bit understated). I know quite a bit about trade cards having learned much from the man that - my opinion - actually created the trade card market in the 1990's; and my own foray albeit for a brief period. That having been said, I know NOTHING about tickets and never having seen any before prefer to defer (ugh-just say no) to others. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: davidcycleback
Thanks for the sentiments. Though I never realized I moved past the Xerox stage ... The question is whether your trade card qualifies as the first known baseball card. I know of no other earlier baseball trade card or baseball card, at least one that has verified year. There are early cards where the date is debatable (Peck & Snyder James Creighton for example), while yours has the year printed on the front. And, as everyone knows by now, that 1863 thing Keith O. has is a laundry ticket which Harry Wright used for his cricket knickers. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
Henry- you are correct that it was once Mark Rucker's, and if memory serves it is coated stock. As I'm sure you know, 1860's material with that glossy finish is rare and desirable. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: davidcycleback
The first Topps Tiffany. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
19th century poster advertising Goodwin's 19th century baseball cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 04-22-2009 05:58 AM |
N184 Kimball Boxers, 19th Century Boxing ticket, Jesse Owens, Walter Hagen on Ebay | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 12-05-2008 09:01 PM |
19th Century Boxing Ticket "Lannon vs. Fowler" | Archive | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 0 | 08-18-2008 08:41 PM |
19th Century Unused Ticket Stub – Questions . . . | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 05-18-2006 08:20 PM |
Is this a 19th century copy of an illustration from a 19th century book ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-06-2004 04:47 PM |