![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
I agree completely. Mr.Wakefield (hi Frank) is still one of my favorite folks on the board. We can all agree to disagree occasionally however, as long as we remain professional, no one gets their panties in a wad. I know I hate it when mine get in a wad....that and bad panty hose really annoy me.... For the record I also don't think it matters whether the buyer was an investor or collector, with repsect to this purchase. The card hasn't gone from being bad to good due to the motive of the buyer....best regards |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1930 Goudey- Babe Ruth- questionable authenticity? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 99 | 01-11-2021 06:17 PM |
The 1930 ruth goudey calendar makes another appearance!! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 08-24-2008 11:58 PM |
Mark Haverkos Final Answer to 1930 Ruth Card Controversy | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 80 | 03-31-2007 10:26 AM |
1930 Goudey Calender | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 10-21-2006 06:25 AM |
(3) N172's I bought on Ebay - the conclusion | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 05-28-2003 01:18 AM |