![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jim Clarke
I think that no matter what the final outcome is.. The Card is now TAINTED. So much bad press on it, will not help it's value for future sales. Even if the card is good,and it came to auction again, I do not think it would fetch 2000.00 IMO. I've been wrong before.. But just voicing my opinion. This is all the way around a lose, lose deal for everyone. It all started with CSA on it right.. That should be the first sign..... JC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1930 Goudey- Babe Ruth- questionable authenticity? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 99 | 01-11-2021 06:17 PM |
The 1930 ruth goudey calendar makes another appearance!! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 08-24-2008 11:58 PM |
Mark Haverkos Final Answer to 1930 Ruth Card Controversy | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 80 | 03-31-2007 10:26 AM |
1930 Goudey Calender | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 10-21-2006 06:25 AM |
(3) N172's I bought on Ebay - the conclusion | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 05-28-2003 01:18 AM |