![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: warshawlaw
For much of its earliest incarnation, the SMR had prices for cards that did not exist. I wrote an article on this point in the old VCBC. PSA, it seems, made up prices for cards in the higher grades in many sets and even had the nerve to put + signs on them from month to month as if those non-existent cards had actually transacted and had actually seen increased prices. Shortly before the article came out PSA altered its advertising for the SMR to remove claims that it was based solely on real transactions. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Grading card question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 06-26-2008 04:52 PM |
Question on an Early baseball Photo | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 06-19-2008 02:05 PM |
Early Photography Question??? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 10-01-2007 09:20 AM |
SGC grading question (possible dumb question) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-08-2006 12:36 AM |
Question on '67 Maris Yankee card an grading service... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-23-2004 07:20 PM |