 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8
12-07-2006, 07:35 AM
|
|||
|
|||
I know PSA is changing the way they list Population report....
Posted By: Griffin's
I'd expect them to off to relabel those for $5, I think that was the price for '52 Red/Black backs. Still, if you have a common back why even bother? I could only see an argument for doing it if it was a Drum, Uzit, EPDG, etc. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1917 E135 Rogers Hornsby PSA Population Report Needed | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 29 | 12-19-2006 08:51 AM |
| PSA Population Report- How Accurate? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 53 | 11-13-2006 08:53 AM |
| Can someone lookup this card in PSA population report for me? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 06-27-2006 05:36 PM |
| PSA/SGC T206 Population Report? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 02-10-2004 09:31 AM |
| PSA Population Report ... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 07-17-2002 08:04 PM |
Threaded Mode