 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36
11-30-2006, 06:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Goodwin & Company's Stance on Hobby Issues
Posted By: Todd Schultz
is that they don't reject them, at least erasures. As has been pointed out, cards with erasures are graded downward, which I understand, but are not rejected outright. So it appears the inclusion of this type of "work" with others by Mr. Foreman was inaccurate. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Memory Lane's Stance on Hobby Issues | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 01-06-2007 08:11 PM |
| SCP Auctions(Sports Cards Plus) Stance on Hobby Issues | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 35 | 12-01-2006 05:13 AM |
| Mile High Card Company's Stance on Hobby Issues | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 96 | 11-30-2006 08:41 PM |
| Andy Madec Sportscards Stance on Hobby Issues | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 11-29-2006 08:58 PM |
| Clean Sweep's Stance on Larger Hobby Issues | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 24 | 11-29-2006 10:56 AM |
Threaded Mode