![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Mike
Based on the previous info, I then should be thankful for the card I have. SGC rated it a 4. Let me add I also believe in the much used phrase "buy the card, not the holder". It is a nice 4. But aren't there many issues that are fragile? In my experience Tattoo Orb's are also fragile. What other obscure issues are fragile, and would cause folks to hesitate to place them in a strangers mits, thereby causing the pop. reports to show limited numbers? |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Looking for Cubans | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 08-09-2008 12:17 PM |
Cubans are Cubans............................ | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 07-14-2007 12:07 PM |
Rarity Question With a Caveat | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 08-16-2006 06:43 PM |
question regarding t205 & t207 back rarity | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 04-01-2003 02:52 PM |
E98 - Set of 30 - Question, comparative rarity | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 11-19-2002 07:59 PM |