![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
Jim- I agree that there is no question the higher end cards are valued almost solely on their pop reports. However, down the road there may be a greater knowledge among buyers that these numbers may not be accurate. It's unclear however whether that information might adversely affect their value. If a card has a low pop, mentioning that will get you the highest price for sure. In your example, if a common sells for more than a Mantle, then its the pop first, the grade second, and oddly, the player last. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1917 E135 Rogers Hornsby PSA Population Report Needed | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 29 | 12-19-2006 08:51 AM |
I know PSA is changing the way they list Population report.... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 12-07-2006 07:35 AM |
Can someone lookup this card in PSA population report for me? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 06-27-2006 05:36 PM |
PSA/SGC T206 Population Report? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 02-10-2004 09:31 AM |
PSA Population Report ... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 07-17-2002 08:04 PM |