 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36
11-03-2006, 04:14 AM
|
|||
|
|||
New Board Rule
Posted By: Peter_Spaeth
I agree that misrepresenting the price one paid for a card is a material misrepresentation, but the level of rhetoric in the attack against Josh was quite unwarranted in my opinion, and his comments plainly did not condone lying, but merely expressed an opinion that a court might find the statement in question to be immaterial, or not the type of statement a buyer reasonably can rely on. There are a lot of outs for a defendant in a fraud case. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| NO Private Emails posted on this board - rule | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 162 | 09-26-2007 09:02 AM |
| You guys rule | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 10-12-2006 01:32 PM |
| :::::===- - - - DOTS RULE - - -===::::: | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 09-30-2006 07:28 PM |
| A board protocol/rule question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 09-06-2006 10:06 PM |
| New board rule about publicly complaining about an expert's LOA | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 02-10-2005 03:49 PM |
Threaded Mode