 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13
10-29-2006, 06:42 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Ethical Question #549
Posted By: Corey R. Shanus
I believe in erring on the side of disclosure. Suppose in the card Leon describes it was SGC that first rejected it and then PSA slabbed it. Under the rationale of buy the card and not holder, coupled with my view that in regard to vintage cards I have more confidence in what SGC says than PSA, if I was the buyer I sure would want to know the card was rejected by SGC. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Is this ethical??? | Archive | Hockey, Olympic, Auto Racing And All Other Cards | 3 | 03-30-2009 04:59 PM |
| T3 Turkey Red Ty Cobb PSA Authentic $749.95 ($549.95 after MSN Live Cashback) | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 03-01-2009 11:06 AM |
| Hypothetical ethical issue. What would you do? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 06-25-2008 11:43 PM |
| Dealer ethical groups | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 11-26-2006 04:37 PM |
| solution to ethical problems? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 01-17-2005 12:38 PM |
Threaded Mode