![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: martindl
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: mark
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: martindl
Yep, I've seen that before and I know it is one guide, but was really looking for some board memebers' input. With Scot Readers work and things like the EPDG thread, I think theres more info out now that might test some of the multipliers on the chart. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JimB
You would really need to find the right buyer to get a premium from these. Lots of back collectors like the variety of the different brand advertisements, but few care that much about factory designations, etc. There are people out there, but they are less common, like the factory 42 cards themselves. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Hal Lewis
I would say that they fetch a 10x multiplier on commons and about a 5x multiplier on big name cards. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Lee Behrens
I think a fair guess would be 5to 6 times over normal prices. I perrsonally think it should be higher but that seems to be norm in the last couple of years. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Cobby33
The 6x multiplier seems to be pretty accurate. I just picked one up for about that and sold one on eBay about 6 months ago for about that. Frankly, I don't understand T206museum's differentiation between the HOF multipliers and standard multipliers. I haven't noticed that the "big name" cards get exponentially less on rare and scarce backs. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: martindl
Thanks all. I do think the Fact variation backs are more niche than the different brand backs. I think as the hobby continues its maturity we'll see larger gaps in 'value' as the relative scarcity is better understood. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: MVSNYC
i have always said this is a very rare back, it is always under the radar, never getting its fair do, an underdog, so to speak...every now and then they will pop up on eBay, but a very tuff back, i have owned only 2 in 15 years of collecting...just bought a common PSA 3 for almost $190...maybe a 6-7X multiplier? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Scot Reader
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: stella
i would say the market. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Cobby33
I think the thrust of the question had to do with what the market has shown lately. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anthony(Tony)
Do you or anyone you know have any for sale??? I've been looking to add some to my collection..Thanks,Tony |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Cobby33
Email me. Thanks. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: martindl
My Fact 42 back arrived today. Thanks to all for their input and help. Its a 460 subjects-only too, so thanks Scot for the info on that. That back staining at bottom is more than i thought but i'm still pleased. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What Kind Of Premium Is Placed On M101-4 Commons With Gimbels backs? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 03-22-2008 10:42 AM |
buyer's premium | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 09-13-2007 03:46 PM |
T206 backs - is there a checklist of cards with certain backs? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 06-06-2006 05:34 AM |
Piedmont -rare red-backs? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 02-08-2006 09:00 AM |
Silk premium | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 01-22-2005 03:45 PM |