![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
I am almost reluctant to post this as I have been accused by a few individuals of saying things so others won't bid on cards. I think that is idiotic but I guess gossip gets like that. On that point, when asked, no one has ever told the name of 1 person that didn't bid on a card, that I won, and didn't bid because of something I said. Not one. I think they are just outright lies. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: steve f
I'm not familiar to that issue, but have been watching. Thanks for the headsup. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
No worries....alerting folks to good fakes (not every T206 Wagner or colorized Fro Joy) is part of the good of this board. I do want to mention I am only 95% sure the Headin Home cards are bad. If the seller would have guaranteed them I might have bid, as there would have been no risk....but he won't and I am not. I would bet a lunch they aren't real..... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
The brown one looks a little more real than the two blue ones, but can you have a group half real, half bad? Probably not. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
The brown one is one of mine and I am sure it's real....The blue ones are in the auction and I question their legitimacy....I used the brown one for comparison. My other 4 are brown like that too... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
Sorry Leon- didn't read your text too carefully, but at least I proved I can tell a real one from a fake! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jason L
sorry, I couldn't resist that poor attempt for some reason (punchy on Friday) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
One of the most common ways fake cards are made to look real is by some sort of artificial aging- either staining or baking until the card looks brown. Artificial is a good term for it, because to the trained eye it never looks quite right. It's tough to explain precisely, it's just something that intuitively looks wrong with it. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: warshawlaw
Some damage will make a card's stock look different. It is basic paper chemistry. The paper in cards is made of wood pulp. Wood pulp naturally contains acids. Over time, the acids in the wood pulp age and alter the feel and color of the paper. Certain environmental conditions (like sunlight, moisture, etc.) can exacerbate the deterioration of the paper. I have cards that feel very different than other cards from the same set because they've been affected by bad environmental conditions. I have some 1960's cards that are more age toned than my T206's. Why? The quality of board used and the way it is processed, plus the way it is handled and stored. Certain sets brown so badly that they don't even look or feel like they did when issued. I have a near set of 1946 boxing cards that was issued on a low-grade thin chipboard (like a strip card) and it ages very badly. The aging is the best way to separate the original cards from the later reprints of the set; they look and feel totally different. Ditto strip cards. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: T E
If they had been faking cards when I was a kid, the best way to stress a fake card to make it look aged would have been to give it to me for a week. After one week in my posession back then, any card would be scuffed, scraped and played with. No Gem Mint 10s ever came from my collection back then! |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brian
While I have seen the vertical version of that Ruth "Headin Home" card, I have never seen a horizontal version. Is this version especially rare? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
I don't have any horizontal poses and do believe they are more scarce. All of these cards are so scarce I would not place a premium on them though. regards |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: fkw
The thing I picked up on them the first day was the size is larger than any of the know style cards. Also the blue tint is not seen as far as I know. I wrote the seller the first day and pointed out the problems and told him they should be actual photos. I never heard back. With the way I worded the email, I would have thought he would have came back with a reply. I believe he knows they are fakes. Oh well, its a $2000+ leason to someone. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Headin Home Ruth - authentic, reprint or countefeit? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 06-03-2008 07:08 AM |
Headin' Home Ruth card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 02-28-2008 02:50 PM |
Tex Rickard Headin' Home 1920 newspaper ad | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 03-10-2007 08:52 PM |
re: Babe Ruth Headin Home cards -Potential Shill | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 12-13-2006 09:25 PM |
Headin' Home- another from the National | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 09-07-2004 01:20 AM |