![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Peter_Spaeth
Suppose I took an identical card, graded for the sake of example 7 by any one of the major grading companies. I auction it on four different occasions. Hypo 1, I just give the grade and a scan. Hypo 2, I give the grade, a scan, and a glowing description. Hypo 3, I give the grade, the scan, the description, but add that I removed scrapbook material before submitting but it is now undetectable, as shown by the grade. Hypo 4, same as 3 except I add that I soaked and pressed out a small wrinkle before submitting but it is now undetectable, as shown by the grade. I would bet that especially if it was a desirable card, the prices in all four scenarios would not differ significantly. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
About soaking cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 351 | 08-06-2008 01:08 PM |
soaking an Old Judge | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 07-12-2008 06:06 PM |
Card Soaking | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 06-25-2008 06:08 PM |
Soaking question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 04-01-2006 10:24 AM |
Soaking stamps | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 03-23-2005 11:39 AM |