![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Gilbert Maines
Thank you Mike. Based largely on this information, but coupled with other inputs; my understanding on the potential for card fading is that it can be reduced by holder materials which contain either natural or additive filters for ultraviolet light. However, it is recognized that no filtering medium is 100% effective (so even with the best holder possible, it is unwise to leave your slabs poolside for weeks at a time). Also, the potential exists that fading of some cards, or maybe all cards, can be affected by visible light. However, since it is visible light that allows you to see things, any reduction in visible light will make your cards more difficult to see. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Show your most attractive card ....... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 48 | 03-24-2008 06:57 AM |
Most attractive card in each group? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 01-23-2008 11:50 AM |
Most attractive black and white issue? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 40 | 09-19-2007 12:17 PM |
N28 and N29 are attractive sets, but some of the ballplayers | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 11-10-2005 09:29 AM |
Something very rare and quite attractive... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 07-16-2003 08:57 PM |