|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Posted By: Peter Spaeth
I wish that people who don't have evidence, or aren't willing to provide it, would not assert as a FACT that the card is trimmed. If you would like to make out a case based on publicly available scans of the card, and offer an opinion as to why from the scan you see evidence of trimming, that would be appropriate in my view. If you have other compelling evidence, that would also be appropriate in my view. But to just say it's trimmed, or to say I know it's trimmed but without providing your support, is not fair to the current owner. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Multi t206 Wagner owner question... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 09-15-2008 02:43 PM |
| D322 Wagner PSA 3 - Valuation question? | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 15 | 04-18-2008 10:34 PM |
| T-206 Wagner PSA Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 12-24-2007 10:28 AM |
| FS: T206 Heine Wagner ("the other T206 Wagner") PSA 4 - $79 | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 12-19-2007 09:46 PM |
| December auctions - T206 Honus Wagner cards PSA 4 and PSA 1 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 11-17-2004 06:49 PM |