![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Paul
I've got a question for our printing expert, David. The seller claims that a printing expert has determined that this was printed using appropriate printing techniques for the early 1900s. But the card is obviously fake. Is the seller's printing expert out to lunch? Or was it printed using a technique available in the early 1900s and also still available today? It sure looks like a bad photocopy, not even a professionally printed (Dover) reprint. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Find Honus Wagner | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 24 | 10-12-2008 12:26 PM |
another Honus Wagner find | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 37 | 10-13-2007 09:53 PM |
Could be chalking up a new Wagner find shortly! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 114 | 03-18-2007 10:58 AM |
ANY IDEA WHERE TO FIND A T206 WAGNER? | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 05-30-2006 09:24 PM |
Get ready for new Wagner find stories | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 03-15-2002 12:05 PM |