![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#39
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
Rick is correct that it can be a bit of a balancing act. By not wanting to offend your consignor, you put a substandard item on the marketplace. Just from the response on this thread, you can see that it can potentially backfire. I guess in the end you have to make a judgment call. If it were me, I would have told the consignor that the grade on the Lajoie was unacceptable and we would need to have it regraded. Of course, that may not have worked smoothly either. It's a tough one either way. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS:T205 Ty Cobb, Front is NM/MT, Back From PSA! Good 2 ! Offers? | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 26 | 08-06-2008 11:41 PM |
Does this VG/EX 4 have paperloss on back? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 07-17-2008 07:12 PM |
1933 Blue Bird Babe Ruth Front View PSA 6 (Pictures Uploaded) | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 06-29-2007 07:33 PM |
Can anyone explain grading and paperloss? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 05-30-2007 08:15 AM |
Anyone ever received a PSA 4 with paperloss on front? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 04-29-2005 03:09 AM |