![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Josh K.
V117Collector - low grades on decent looking vintage cards should not be a surprise whether graded by psa or sgc. That is not evidence of the grading companies being corrupt (nor is this post intended to imply that psa is corrupt). If you are new to the hobby (as opposed to just this board) you will soon realize that very minor things can hurt the grade of an otherwise outstanding looking vintage card. If you submit to sgc and your card has a wrinkle that can only be seen with magnification - its going to get no better than a 40 in almost all circumstances. If it has a spec of paperloss its unlikely to receive higher than a 30 no matter how nice it looks. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS:T205 Ty Cobb, Front is NM/MT, Back From PSA! Good 2 ! Offers? | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 26 | 08-06-2008 11:41 PM |
Does this VG/EX 4 have paperloss on back? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 07-17-2008 07:12 PM |
1933 Blue Bird Babe Ruth Front View PSA 6 (Pictures Uploaded) | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 06-29-2007 07:33 PM |
Can anyone explain grading and paperloss? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 05-30-2007 08:15 AM |
Anyone ever received a PSA 4 with paperloss on front? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 04-29-2005 03:09 AM |