![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: David Vargha
Adam is correct. If the seller posts clear front and back scans and if he discloses any hidden flaws not detectable by the scans, then it is a very reasonable policy. But if the policy is in effect with anything less than full disclosure as stated, then it is only in place to take advantage of an unsuspecting buyer. Now at a card show, the policy is clearly fair because the buyer has ample opportunity to assess the card. Of course, material mistakes such as incorrect information on the flip would make the policy invalid. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GAI graded cards of E120, E95 Caramel Cards and more ending tonight | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 1 | 10-02-2007 04:15 PM |
Graded and non-graded Tattoo Orbits and other cards now on ebay | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 2 | 05-23-2007 08:35 PM |
O/T... Mantle returns. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 03-05-2007 01:26 PM |
Ebay fees on returns | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-11-2006 08:49 PM |
Returns on ebay sales issue | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 02-26-2002 04:56 PM |