"PIEDMONT 1st" Theory - Magie, Doyle Errors, etc.

[Archive]

Posted By: Ted Zanidakis

Dan K

Do you have the Lindaman (SC350) in your possesion ? We are not tabulating
either "hear-say" cards or cards depicted on Ebay, as there have been instances
where the seller has displayed a different back than is on the card. I thought
you understood this....this has been noted to you by Scot Reader and by me in
the EPDG Thread.

We have received over 50 actual inputs on Lindaman; 36 of which are 150 backs,
and 10 are HINDU, and 6 are EPDG. Your contention...."that if there is an EPDG,
there must be a 350 back"....may well be be valid (and possibly a P350 Lindaman
will surface). But, an actual one has not been reported, yet. And. the same goes
for Ewing; however, a Jones (St Louis) with a P350 back very recently showed up.

I do not have proof of Piedmont 350 backs being produced 1st in the 350 Series.....
But, I have offered a theory to explain the Joe Doyle error that in effect gives us some
insight that suggests a high probability that this "Piedmont 1st" theory is valid. And,
virtually, every time we have discounted a potential 150-only card in this survey, it
has been because a P350 has been reported (not a Sweet Cap 350 or a Sov 350).

It is encouraging to me that Bill Heitman, Scot Reader, Brian Weisner, and others
appear to be supportive of my premise.


T-Rex Ted