![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Cat
Research in the last year indicates that the m101-5s and m101-4s were both printed in 1916. The m101-5s are still believed to be the earlier print cycle. Also, I believe there is some evidence that the blank back m101-5 was the earliest of all print cycles. The information on these cards seems to be a bit fluid so I am not sure the sands have stopped shifting. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1922 e120 vs. 1916 m101-4 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 06-25-2008 10:09 AM |
1916 M101-5 Dick Rudolph | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 10-03-2006 05:43 PM |
1916 M101-4 Set on ebay | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 6 | 03-14-2006 08:37 PM |
1916 M101-4/5 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 01-06-2005 08:06 AM |
Need help identifying this 1916 issue. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 12-22-2002 09:42 AM |