 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18
02-09-2006, 08:36 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Submissions from different people......oh well.
Posted By: Chad
Except that card grading is ENTIRELY dependent on the company's reputation. At the heart of their business, reputation is all they have. I would think that a better long term a business model would be to create an unassailable aura of objectivity. Otherwise this whole era of grading is going to come to a quick end and be remembered with embarassment as an unfortunate joke. I'm ambivalent about grading myself, but I hope the service gets better, not worse, because it does have its benefits. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| SGC bulk submissions??? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 06-20-2008 01:00 PM |
| PSA submissions at a card show | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 08-22-2007 06:33 PM |
| Question for SGC submissions... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 04-11-2007 12:42 PM |
| Grading Co. submissions from Canada | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 02-22-2004 05:15 AM |
| PSA Submissions received back | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 10-31-2001 08:05 AM |
Threaded Mode