![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
Richard- you may be on to something. Maybe an Old Judge needs a grade that reflects wear and a second designation indicating photo quality, since the photo is the single most important characteristic of the card. Of course, you could take this a step further and ask does a T206 need a second designation for richnesss of color? Who knows, perhaps that is the future of grading. I brought this lively discussion up because I have seen too many OJ's graded 60 and 70, sometimes even 80, with photos so light it is difficult to make out details. That to me is not a satisfactory evaluation. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Any idea what this is? | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 4 | 01-21-2009 05:52 AM |
Any idea what this is? | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 7 | 08-20-2008 06:10 PM |
Any Idea What Happened to.............. | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 1 | 10-16-2007 11:42 AM |
Any idea on how to | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 03-06-2004 05:52 AM |
Cool idea....but | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 01-21-2003 12:55 PM |