![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: cmoking
Two 1933 Goudey #1 Benny Bengough PSA 7s went on auction in the Mile High (wednesday) and Mastronet (thursday) auctions. The Mile High one went for $9100. The Mastronet went for about $5800 (after the juice). The Mile High one has a print defect that makes the card unattractive IMO. Am I missing something or is this odd to see the Mile High one go for so much more? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Steve Dawson
I don't think you're missing anything. If anyone is, it's the two highest bidders on the MHC card! I agree with you, that fisheye is ugly!!! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: WP
strange. What did the NM-MT 8 close at??? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: DJ
Novemeber 13th Mile High auction, 1933 Goudey #1 Benny Bengough PSA 7 $6,726.00. Same one? Not Sure. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Hal Lewis
Wouldn't the "first to end" always get a higher price with rare cards... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: cmoking
I do think the first to end probably sells for more, that does make sense. I wonder if the smaller catalog auctions schedule their auctions around Mastro's schedule...that would be smart. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: brian drent
While I do not often post here I do read the boards from time to time and really find the discussions very interesting. Although I do not want to get blasted for spam I would like to correct a bit of misinformation regarding this post, that being the selling prices of the two 19933 #1 Goudey B. Bengough cards. The mastro card did sell for roughly $5800 after the BP, but the card in my auction actually sold for $10,462.63 after the BP not the $9100 (price before the BP) To try to explain this may be difficult, save to say that I do believe that our card being offered first deffiantly helped in the price realized as well many times material in a smaller auction does perform to stronger levels. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Hal Lewis
Great Auction, Brian! |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: WP
After looking at the Bengough PSA 8, I think that it is accurately graded. However, the card is dull and narrow but is sharp and within the NM-MT centering guidelines. This particular copy has floated around for years. I believe it was in a Mile High auction years ago. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: cmoking
Brian, you guys had a great auction. It ran smoothly and had very good material. My post wasn't meant to denigrate your auction or the card you auctioned off, in fact, I think it serves notice for sellers to consider Mile High. I was just confused as to the big difference in price. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Harry Wallace (HW)
That is one of the attractions of auctions. There are items athat make you scratch your head as to why they sold for so much (most of the time) or so little. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
what am i missing from this auction? hardly near mint in my eyes | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 10-08-2006 12:07 PM |
The idiocy of eBay- not even pre-war collectors are exempt | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 02-19-2006 05:41 PM |
what am i missing here | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 12-24-2004 12:21 PM |
Excuse my idiocy, but what does "Who's your Daddy?" mean? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 10-21-2004 07:54 PM |
Am I missing something here? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 09-12-2002 07:33 PM |