![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JimB
About 7 or 8 years ago I submitted a raw 1953 Campanella which I expected to get an 8 or 9 on. It came back a six. I couldn't believe it. About 6 months later I submitted it again and it came back 6 again. Finally at a show I did it again and again it came back a 6. I asked the guy who now works for GAI to explain to me why it was a six. He pointed to the most minute wrinkle on the back and said the highest they could grade a card with a wrinkle was a six. To this day I would argue that it is just the unevenness of the cardboard and not a wrinkle. At least they were consistent. I am not saying this is what happened with your cards. Just sharing an experience which may have some relevance. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
"Auctioneer Bashing" by Joe Orlando | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 82 | 06-05-2008 11:15 AM |
June Mastro Classic Collector Auction - NOT a Mastro bashing thread! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 07-19-2007 09:17 PM |
I'm not PSA bashing...part two | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 03-16-2007 07:05 PM |
More PSA bashing | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 06-20-2005 02:03 PM |
PSA Bashing getting old. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 41 | 06-09-2005 04:50 PM |