![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: robert
Latley I have been seeing the grade "AUTH" on cards by PSA and GAI is this the new classifiaction lower then a "1". In the past I have seen this on autogaphed cards to state that the signature was authentic. In my opinion they are creating a lot of confusion and should start adding a numerical grade to the autographed cards and give the choice to people to send back the previous graded auto material to have them fix this problem. Now it seems that a grade of "AUTH" means that the cards is real but has been tampered with ie, trimmed, enhanced, altered, etc...am I the only one who sees this a a potential problem or am I wrong on my perception of the meaning "AUTH" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: tbob
Personally, I like it. A great looking rare pre-war card can be slabbed and protected where the grading company arguably feels it is trimmed (note I say arguably because not all AUTH cards I have seen appear to be altered). I'll give you an example- I have all the 1910 Obak Series of 150 cards slabbed in SGC holders (except one which I still need). 2 of the cards I bought from board members came up "trimmed" but I was still able to get SGC to give them AUTH grades and thus keep the set together and in homogenous holders. Perhaps another grading company might have given them a numerical grade but I wanted to keep the set in the same holders for aesthetic reasons, if nothing else. I just wish SGC, GAI and PSA would recognize that the majority of 1909 Obaks were hand cut and give them AUTH status, but that is another story for another day... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Kevin Cummings
I agree. The last time I had cards graded by SGC I requested that they slab them with "AUTHENTIC" if they failed to make a regular grade. It still makes for a great visual presentation and provides protection for an item that is still valuable. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: warshawlaw
Autographed and non-autographed cards. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: identify7
And what grade do they offer when you request an AUTH grading on an authentic card with a phoney autograph? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Lee Behrens
There has been some SGC OJs lately that have been grraded authentic. Explaination on auction was they did not meet size requirement. I still wish they would slab authenticwith qualifiers (trim, size, altered, etc.). |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Julie Vognar
Appearently, they're going to get all my autographs authenticated--I only brought the books into the room by mistake...some nice photos, some HOF placks, some 3x5s. Nothing real old--some cards too. Some I or my son got in person or through the mail from the player; some I bought...who knows how many are authentic? Hope someone does! |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Signed photo auth | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 4 | 12-22-2008 12:14 PM |
Re: 1952 Topps Mantle AUTH | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 12-08-2008 01:32 PM |
SGC Grade A (Auth) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 02-27-2008 08:08 PM |
Auth vs (1) Poor grade | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 10-03-2007 08:24 PM |
SGC AUTH with card attributes | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 01-18-2007 12:11 PM |