 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
10-08-2005, 12:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Low grade preference
Posted By: barrysloate
I think the people who collect in the low to middle grades are very serious about their collecting and like to buy pleasing cards that fit into their budgets. This group seems to feel that SGC is stricter and more accurate so these cards become very desirable. When you get into the higher grades, particularly when you cross the line into the set registry crowd, they seem to prefer PSA. That just tends to be the trend today. 
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS: Mostly low-grade, low-cost cards | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 4 | 03-31-2009 05:22 AM |
| FS: Mostly low-grade, low-cost cards | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 03-29-2009 04:55 PM |
| T206 Cobb bat on off anyone??? LOW LOW GRADE? | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 01-03-2008 10:08 AM |
| Low grade to mid-grade 50s Topps sets desired | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 01-17-2006 05:41 PM |
| Looking for Toleteros Hilton Smith low low low grade | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 07-30-2005 06:29 PM |
Hybrid Mode
