 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28
09-30-2005, 11:12 AM
|
|||
|
|||
2006 Standard Catalog Index Error
Posted By: Chad
I have a pretty liberal definition of baseball card and it's disappointing to think stuff would need to be deleted so they can include all the new Topps parallel sets. My thinking is more more more! Vintage stuff, of course. Just don't delete the super balls, because, even though I don't collect them or even own one, they are extra super cool. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Looking 4, 2006 Standard Catalog Of Baseball Cards | Archive | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 0 | 03-02-2006 08:13 PM |
| Vintage Index (pre 1920) for 2006 Standard Catalog of Baseball Cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 02-19-2006 05:53 AM |
| ? for those with 2006 Standard Catalog | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 12-29-2005 05:34 PM |
| 2006 Standard Catalog | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 11-30-2005 12:43 PM |
| Apparent dating error in R328 Standard Catalog listing | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 30 | 09-01-2005 02:26 PM |
Threaded Mode