 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12
09-24-2005, 11:53 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Rookie debate Part 2......Cobb
Posted By: Anonymous
To me any card issued in the same calendar year is on equal footing with any other. So in the case for example of Tony Gwynn, his 1983 Topps Fleer and Donruss cards are all his "true" RCs. I also think almost anyone except Hal would agree that if a player first appeared in a traded set, that too is his "true" RC. Even Beckett agrees with that except for a few years they had the stupid "XRC" designation which results in some second year cards like 85 Clemens and 87 Bonds still being misdesignated as RCs. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Continuing the Ty Cobb/Ty Cobb back debate | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 92 | 01-31-2009 05:50 PM |
| Let's really "re-hash" the ROOKIE debate. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 135 | 08-12-2007 11:10 PM |
| 1938 GOUDEY #4C part 1 JOE DIMAGGIO ROOKIE Card PRO 4.5 | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 5 | 07-10-2006 10:10 AM |
| Ty Cobb Rookie ?.....let's debate it . | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 41 | 03-11-2006 06:15 PM |
| Cobb Rookie Photo on Ebay | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 11-05-2004 03:05 PM |
Threaded Mode