 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9
08-23-2005, 06:50 AM
|
|||
|
|||
This guy must have a relative grading at PSA
Posted By: Texas Ted
Not to defend this card or the seller by any means, but it is possible that either or both the surface of the scanner or the plastic holder have dirt, smudges, flaws or some other issue that change the look of the card. I guess it would be hard to judge what it really looks like unless holding it in your hand. While I try to remember to clean the surface of my scanner periodically, dirt happens. I have also done scans only to discover later that a cat hair or something else was on the top loader, but made the card look different. In the interest of handling cards as little as possible, I do not remove from the top loader to make my scans. And of course, that is not possible with graded cards. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| relative value of kahns cards | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 3 | 06-18-2013 01:03 AM |
| T206 -- Relative Scarcity or What Autographs Can Tell You | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 01-27-2009 06:27 AM |
| Relative value for different Cobb caramel cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 24 | 12-13-2005 01:32 PM |
| Help with estimate of relative availability of T cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 05-31-2004 12:46 PM |
| Anyone know the relative rarity of E-98's? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 02-14-2003 08:34 AM |
Threaded Mode