![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brian Weisner
I vote # 2 or #3 . I think anything that helps collectors communicate is a good thing. Like PSA or not, It's been a positive to have collectors, meet greet and trade cards of similiar interest. I have met lots of nice collectors on both SGC and PSA registry's and look forward to meeting many more. Be well Brian |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Has anyone had recent problems with PSA Registry | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 06-29-2008 07:27 PM |
New PSA Set Registry | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 05-22-2008 02:10 PM |
How accurate is the PSA Registry? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 02-24-2008 06:06 PM |
Set Registry -- opinions please | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 08-26-2002 10:44 PM |
Does PSA have a card registry now? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 01-17-2002 08:25 PM |