![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: joe brennan
I choose 3. Its ok to keep track of your cards and needs. I've bought some of the cards I need from fellow collectors. I think it gets way out of hand when it comes to the PSA 9's and 10's for common players. I used my 1963 Fleer Football set as an example. ( sorry not vintage, but a childhood set) PSA 7's go for $8, while 9's go for $200. $190 x 70 commons = $13k difference. Most of my 7's, to the naked eye, centering and corners, are only minutely different than the 9. I'd rather have the jack to spend on OJ's or T206's than be ranked #1 for another 20k in the set including stars. JMO though. out |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Has anyone had recent problems with PSA Registry | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 06-29-2008 07:27 PM |
New PSA Set Registry | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 05-22-2008 02:10 PM |
How accurate is the PSA Registry? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 02-24-2008 06:06 PM |
Set Registry -- opinions please | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 08-26-2002 10:44 PM |
Does PSA have a card registry now? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 01-17-2002 08:25 PM |