![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#40
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jay behrens
How about an even easier solution. And SGC doesn't have to look any further than it's comic slabbing conterpart. Green labels and grades for unaltered cards with notes as to defects and red lables for alterd cards with notes as to alteration. You can still grade the red labels too. But just like in the comic world, red lables would end being worth much less than it's green counterpart. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SOLD - High-Grade 1909 Ramly (T204) - Tim Murnane HOF Rookie Card (SGC 60) | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 06-30-2008 05:21 PM |
High Grade Sale '64 SGC 84 Yaz; '68 SGC 86 Seaver; '57 SGC 80 Yanks; '67 SGC 84 BrockFlood | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 11-23-2007 09:05 AM |
I thought SGC didn't grade restored card? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 25 | 09-28-2005 12:32 AM |
Will SGC grade an E103 Williams Caramel card if | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 12-31-2004 02:16 PM |
Answer to how little of a card SGC will grade | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 08-08-2002 11:20 AM |