![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: warshawlaw
On this very subject. The SMR has always been a promotional device rather than an honest price guide. In its early days PSA went so far as to list non-existent cards in their best investments section and to boost their prices with the little "+" sign despite never baving graded the damned things! It was a total fraud. They still supply prices via the SWAG (Standard Wild Ass Guess) method because so many grade-card combos simply do not exist. Want to try an interesting experiment? Pick a post-war year and track sales of HOFers from a Topps or Bowman set via ebay for a while then compare the prices realized to the SMR prices. When I did it the average prices were ALL below SMR. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SMR | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 02-24-2009 05:29 PM |
SMR | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 04-14-2007 10:17 AM |
SMR a little off? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 08-13-2006 11:27 PM |
Extra SMR | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 03-19-2005 10:07 AM |
Anyone here with an SMR? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 03-25-2002 10:28 PM |