 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17
06-21-2005, 12:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
The grader must've been blind on this one
Posted By: Todd Schultz
there are stains and there are stains. That Obak has a huge, almost oily looking stain running right down the middle of the card, obscuring the face and pretty much destroying all visual appeal of the card. Throw in paper loss by his crotch, and you've got a 1. That Joss does not suffer from any of those deficiencies, and still only got a 2. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Someone who knows an SGC grader...... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 11-21-2008 01:48 PM |
| Favorite Grader(s)... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 05-31-2008 04:27 AM |
| Going Blind and Crazy- where are my photo experts? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 07-27-2006 08:10 PM |
| At last an honest grader! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 07-21-2004 05:44 PM |
| Bombshell: PRO's head grader hired by AAA??? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 01-22-2003 11:27 AM |
Threaded Mode