![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Chris
The seller of the card offered a full refund and what iI believe to be a sincere apology. I wrote back and told him that although I was unhappy about him not disclosing the pen mark or providing a scan of the back i was happy to have the card. I feel the card front is acuurate as far as the grade goes,there is no crease and no paper loss, worn borders, rounded corners and some fading, but the (two) marks on the back, a L in the upper left corner and a G on the upper right corner ,well this brings me back to a grading question, with these two marks and the description I have given, does this card deserve the grade of 2.5 g-vg? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1936 Wide Pen/Fine Pen Lots, sets for sale | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 02-02-2009 01:06 PM |
T206 printer's marks | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 07-24-2008 09:40 PM |
Pen/Pencil marks | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 12-22-2006 02:38 PM |
For sale Prices Reduced - T206 Matty's Gai-5.5 & Gai-6.5 / T205 Cy Young Gai-4.5 | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 09-29-2005 11:20 PM |
Pen Marks on cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 04-22-2005 03:05 PM |