 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
05-24-2005, 01:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Why is T206 considered One set
Posted By: warshawlaw
Burdick wasn't particularly enamored of back variations (nor was anyone else at a time when cards sold for a nickel each). He tends to designate cards as part of sets based on fronts with different backs given short shrift. The later sets cited as using T206 fronts have different ink and/or some different teams designated and/or different finishes. I can see why a front-centric cataloguer would treat the T206 brands as one. I do the same with T218-T219-T220-T225 boxing, following Burdick's lead, even though there are similar rarity issues with respect to some of the back variations there. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| All things considered - | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 03-01-2009 07:59 AM |
| So what is really considered having the complete set? T-206 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 09-18-2008 11:45 AM |
| Selling Entire T206 Collection. Offers Considered | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 5 | 08-26-2007 08:40 PM |
| Someone give me a good reason why Type 1 Coupons are not considered T206. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 07-17-2007 07:42 AM |
| T206 printing error variations...still considered premiums? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 06-29-2007 07:49 AM |
Threaded Mode