![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Paul
It's just that the Fro Joy's are one of my favorites, so I was pretty sure about them. Certain staining like on this Goudey is a warning sign, only because I've seen dozens of them. Just like the staining on the back of some of Ruth 1932 US Caramel reprints. I'm no expert. I'm just here to learn like the rest of us. As soon as you think you know it all, your gonna get burned. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1933 Ruth #149 PSA 5 | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 03-18-2009 11:39 AM |
1933 Goudey Ruth #149 PSA 4 MK | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 04-13-2008 03:51 PM |
FOUND ONE, THANKS -- WTB: '33 Goudey Ruth #149 | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 12-16-2007 11:53 PM |
A fake??? 33 Ruth #149 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 05-26-2006 06:07 PM |
Ruth #149 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 02-09-2005 07:24 PM |