 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11
04-02-2005, 10:31 AM
|
|||
|
|||
1949 Leaf set - NOT 1948!!
Posted By: Andy Baran
I used to debate with other collectors about which cards are "true" rookie cards. I discovered that everyone views this differently, so it is useless to debate. Every collector that is interested in rookie cards needs to decide for themselves what constitutes a rookie card. I know Hal well enough that he will not consider a "1949" Leaf card to be a rookie card is the player is represented in the "1948" Bowman set. What my list shows is that there are choices that collectors can make beyond Leaf and Bowman. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1948 Leaf vs. 1949 Leaf? | Archive | Football Cards Forum | 3 | 03-31-2009 04:54 AM |
| WTB 1948 and 1949 Bowman or Leaf autographed rookies of the following: | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 12-25-2008 08:02 PM |
| 1948 or 1949 Leaf | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 2 | 01-16-2008 06:32 AM |
| 1949 Leaf BB set....show us your cards | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 59 | 11-27-2007 11:48 PM |
| Basic Differences of 1948 vs 1949 LEAF Sports Sets | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 04-14-2005 04:08 PM |
Threaded Mode