![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Andy Baran
I was able to get PSA to authenticate and slab my Just So Tobacco Jesse Burkett. I just wanted to share the scan, in case anyone is interested. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Hal Lewis
SUPER JOB by PSA! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
They did something right. Congrats !!! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Scott Forrest
That's not an altered mount - it's a mount from a completely different issue. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Paul
I think this is a great step in the right direction for PSA. But I have a suggestion for how they could improve things. I'd like to see the word "altered" on the front, and on the back have a more detailed description of the alteration. Better still, the back could say "see website for details of the alteration." Then an even more complete explanation could be given. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Beautiful Card!
Are they real? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: warshawlaw
real or not, they're fun to play with |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
Andy- I'm happy for you that you got your Burkett slabbed. But I think it's going to open a big can of worms. PSA, and others, will soon be bombarded by everyone who has a trimmed or altered card who wants to get theirs slabbed too. Wasn't the whole point of PSA to keep altered cards out of holders? Now they grade altered cards and state so on the label. In essence, no card can be turned down now. Soon you will see labels which read: "altered, trimmed, recolored, and a crease was spooned out of the corner, otherwise authentic." Just my opinion, but I think this is starting a bad precedent- your good fortune notwithstanding. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: dennis
if they do authenticate altered cards at least you know what you have,its encapsulated,its labeled authentic.if a collector pays for that service,why not provide it? how can this possibly do any harm?i think it would end a lot of the scamming that takes place all over,not just on ebay. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
It does no harm, but it stretches the parameters of what should be encapsulated. If I go out and purchase an N28 Adrian Anson that is blank backed because it was cut years ago from an advertising poster, then go out and purchase an N28 pedestrian and have the back of it skinned off and glued to the Anson, do I now have something worthy of a holder? After all, front and back are both authentic, both are from 1887, so why not a holder for that which reads: "authentic-altered?" When the public saw that PSA would be swamped with hundreds of home made cards that were nothing more than spare parts glued together. And Andy's card, despite its rarity and high value, is nothing more than that- two separate cards melded together. Nothing against Andy, because I know he is happy with the result, and the card came back from the conservator looking rather spiffy- but I don't believe it should be holdered. Again, the holders were originally made to kick out altered cards; now they are being welcomed with open arms. My point is where do you draw the line? |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Scott Forrest
also gives more credibility to PSA's slabbed, "unaltered" cards. Collectors will be more likely to think "hey, it's slabbed as unaltered so there's no chance it has a problem - if it were altered it would be in one of those 'altered' slabs." |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Hal Lewis
My guess is that they will draw the line at: "Very very rare one-of-a-kind type items" like this. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
Yes Hal, and they authenticated my two cricket cards too, and they were submitted by me only because that was demanded by my consignor, and he wished to conform to the two that were previously sold. But I could have told anyone willing to listen that they were authentic- after all, I do have over twenty years of experience with vintage material. But how rare is rare? If I have an N167 Ewing that was torn out of a scrapbook, and purchase an N167 boxer (not cheap, but cheaper than baseball), and use the back to repair it, does that qualify as rare enough? After all, there can't be more than 2-3 N167 Ewings out there? Again, where do you draw the line, and why set this precedent in the first place? I predict that PSA is opening themselves up to a lot of unnecessary grief down the road. Are they going to have to have a conference every time one of these rare hybrids comes in to decide if they should holder it? That's going to waste a lot of company time. Will they make a list of all acceptable rare cards, and a second list of the ones that don't qualify? And if a small hoard of Just So's is suddenly found, and by a miracle it contains two Burketts, does Andy receive a recall from the company saying we have to remove your card from the holder? My last comment was tongue in cheek, of course, but I am just opening this up to examination and discussion. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: An Authentic What?
On one hand, the owner has a beautiful card, but on the other hand, it's another step towards giving stabilization a cleansed look. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Scott Forrest
What if the owner of the Just So Burkett "border" comes forward and decides to combine it with an actress image? Does PSA slab that hybrid as well? |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
is that PSA did the right thing. I think their "authentic only" slabs should be done on a case by case basis and this is a good one. It's a judgement call not unlike a lot of things in life. Personally I still agree with what they are doing in these cases. One person's opinion.....regards |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
Fair point Scott- but do you think someone really saved that border? I think it may be lost, and I know you were just kind of joking. But there is another point I would like to bring up- and Andy, if you are reading this and I am sure you are- this is in no way a slight to you. It was your goal to get the card encapsulated, and you achieved it, and I know you a thrilled. But this does raise some important issues. One day you may decide to sell the card, and as time goes by and the card has changed hands several times, will there eventually be an owner who has no concept of the degree to which the card has been altered? We are not talking about removing a crease or erasing some pencil writing, and by trimmed we are not suggesting it's a 1/16 inch short on the bottom border. This is about as big an alteration as a card could possibly go through. Does PSA provide enough information on the label so that someone long down the road will be aware of it? I don't think so. Someone I spoke to suggested a before and after image should be included with the card, though I'm not sure how that could be done. Andy, I know you are honest enough to disclose to some future buyer exactly what was done, but after we are all long gone will some eventual buyer understand the process the card has been through? Again, just pointing out some of the ramifications of what I think slabbing this card has created. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jay Miller
I agree with Barry that PSA made a horrible mistake by slabbing this Frankenstein card. The whole concept of altered cards being kept out of holders has been destroyed (I'm not counting the Wagner). BTW, Hal I completely disagree with you. You set a policy and stick to it. The value of a card, or part of a card, should not determine whether it is slabbed or not; the authenticity of a card should. BTW, PSA could have just as easily called this an altered, restored, Just So actress card. There is more actress cardboard than baseball cardboard. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Scott Forrest
But it was aimed at the extent of the alteration, as you have so well described in your response. I don't think it should have been slabbed. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jay Miller
Andy--BTW, what was the purpose of having PSA slab this card? It could have been protected in a screw down holder. |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: warshawlaw
grind up an N167 actress card, not a boxer |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: john/z28jd
I think this card has got enough publicity now that it cant be sold to a knowledgable person(aka someone who knows why they are paying a fortune for this card) without them knowing its history.Leons thread about the views that this board gets per day should prove theres alot of reading going on of this board(sell me Old Judge Larry Corcoran cards) and it would be hard for someone not to know what they are getting.The other part is,what would stop someone from taking it out of the holder before they sold it so PSA's label doesnt even come into play? |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Scott Forrest
but what about others they slab? They need a policy and to stick with it; otherwise their slabs lose meaning, I mean they lose more meaning. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
Adam- You are right, actress cards are cheaper. I wasn't sure if N167 actresses existed. I'm don't think I've seen one. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: john/z28jd
I always thought they shouldve slabbed altered cards anyway and labeled them with the alteration.I figured thats better than rejecting a card because then they are sending a card back into the market that has no disclosure of the problem(s) it has. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jay Miller
Barry--They exist. You probably didn't notice them because they look alot like the boxers (both dog and fighter species) |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
John- That's actually a really good point, but if someone unscrupulous got a card back in a holder labelled "trimmed" they would just break it out, so you are back to square one. In the case of the counterfeit money, it would ultimately be confiscated and destroyed. Could you imagine a grading company refusing to return a trimmed card to the submitter and taking it upon themselves to destroy it. Couldn't imagine anyone getting angry at that. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: john/z28jd
The breaking it out of the holder is the point i made in my previous answer before Scotts question. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
I'm glad we're in agreement. Not too many people agree with me these days. I think I'm on a losing streak. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Scott Forrest
sorry, Barry - couldn't resist. |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
I knew someone would get it. Good work Scott. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Hal Lewis
I won't dare ask if the Rolling Stones ever appeared on SNL. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
Late 70's, with Mick Taylor. I'm done. End of story. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Scott Forrest
no fighting, just fun - removed to keep Leon happy. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
this sort of stuff got us in hot water last time...let's get back on track please......thanks |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Chuck R
I think the folks that restored the card did a fabulous job, but the end result is a hobby novelty. The concept of the border of a card being a "mount" for the image is new to me. I understand the general idea of how this restoration was done, but to me a card is a single entity. What if I managed to obtain the top two thirds of a Four Base Hits Kelly and the bottom two thirds of a Four Base Hits Kelly and surgically trimmed and attached them to make something indistinguishable from a Kelly with a deep crease? What exactly have I created? To me it's not an altered card, but two cards attached together, the same as in the example in this thread. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
I think disclosure is the fairest way to handle a situation such as this, and I don't even think the entire onus falls on the owner because we are all owners of cards for just a short time. There should be more information on the label of the Burkett, and that's assuming we buy the premise that it should be slabbed in the first place. Because this is I believe the first card of this type that PSA has encapsulated, perhaps the whole process was not properly thought through. I just see too many dangers in having a three or four word description on the label which clearly does not encompass all the various steps taken to get this card to its current state. It's the great lack of information present that I find troubling. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Hal Lewis
But Barry... |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Hal Lewis
In fact, I would LOVE to see a TON of PSA slabbed "trimmed" cards appear on the market... |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
I responded to John Dreker earlier that labelling a card "trimmed" is actually better than having someone inadvertently buy a trimmed card, but that if the seller were unscrupulous he would break it out anyway. And as far as Andy is concerned, I have implicit faith in his honesty and I know that even if it weren't slabbed he would never deceive anyone when the time came to sell it (and I would guess if you look closely you can see the work done); however, Jay Miller made a very good point. Andy created a Frankenstein monster here, and while he is free to enjoy it to its fullest and as owner has full rights to restore it as he pleases, it is certainly one-of-a-kind. Do we know of any other vintage card that has had this exact kind of work done to it? I just go with my original premise that the grading services were formed to both grade cards and to reject altered ones. Now they are slabbing altered cards. I don't get it. However, for those like yourself who feel it is better to have it in a slab, you have my blessing. I just think there somehow should be more information on the label. As I said, a card that was a 1/16 inch short and had a crease spooned out would fit the same definition as the label on the Burkett. I think there is the potential for trouble down the road, and I will still stick by my opinion that this type of "card" shouldn't be slabbed. And it would be protected nicely in a screw down holder. What else can I say? |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: NO! NO! NO!
|
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Rich Klein
Want to hear more about the Stones on SNL. I remember watching them in a dorm in Pennsylvania while on a road trip playing ultimate frisbee (I was in real good shape in those days) and they were terrible. Great album the songs came from, terrible acoustics and maybe actually a bit overwhelmed by the whole experience of NOT being in an arena. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Scott Forrest
You shall be beaten - shape up! |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
I promised Leon I would behave, so please everyone, let's just get along. SNL seems to be the code word for trouble; I snuck it in for a fleeting moment but got right back on topic. Let's all of us just move on. Thank you, Barry |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Evolution Is
Collectors that knew how to grade their cards. |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
went back and re-read it and sort of understand...(envisioning a guy with a big bong and banging on it...booooonnnnnggggg) |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Rich Klein
Bringing up memories of my youth which have not been touched in 25 years was quite fun. Now, If i could only remember what vintage cards I should have bought in those years instead of purchasing 1979 Topps Packs. |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Scott Forrest
I was completely joking. I had responded initially to Barry's allusion to the Stones, and received a warning from "the powers that be". I'm all for friendly digressions - keeps the conversation lively - but I'll certainly respect Leon's wishes. Gotta go - too sunny out to stay in here on the computer. |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: PASJD
I claim no expertise in this area, but just as a matter of semantics, the use of the word "authentic" seems perhaps inconsistent with the use of the words "altered" and "trimmed" on the same label. |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Max Weder
Noting the pile of unslabbed Classic Comics/Illustated arising from a misspent youth (when I should have been collecting vintage baseball), I recall that CGC comics will grade comics with a restored label. (http://www.cgccomics.com/grading ... oh that dreaded purple...) |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1922 Tobacco Card: Ross Young, Jesse Barnes | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 11-23-2023 04:04 PM |
Cy/Burkett/Keeler | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 03-19-2009 12:16 PM |
Just So Tobacco - Jesse Burkett | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 12-14-2008 05:07 PM |
Just So Burkett | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 04-11-2007 09:51 PM |
Just So Tobacco Burkett Restoration Project | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 51 | 12-25-2004 06:09 PM |