 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7
03-06-2005, 12:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
1933 Goudey Variation / Error?
Posted By: Glenn
As a rule, rarity should be a reasonably good predictor of value. I always figured miscut cards were worth less than properly cut cards because uncut sheets exist and one can produce his or her own miscut cards by hand (and would do so if miscut cards commanded a premium; that is, more of them would enter the population as soon as they became more valuable -- which is exactly what keeps them from becoming more valuable). Wrong backs, however, are rare and will remain so no matter how much people are willing to pay for them; therefore they ought to command a premium. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Goudey Premium variation | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 03-25-2022 02:10 PM |
| Trading a Henry Johnson signed 1933 goudey for almost any other signed 1933 goudey | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 02-28-2009 06:10 PM |
| 1923/24 Tomas Gutierrez error variation | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 01-26-2006 02:21 PM |
| SCD/Krause Standard Catalog Error or New Variation? (S74 Silk Smith) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 08-07-2005 05:11 PM |
| The Magie - Doyle Error vs Variation Caper | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 12-15-2003 02:44 AM |
Threaded Mode