![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Gilbert Maines
If a card owner improves the appearance of his card through skill so fine that the alteration can not be detected, then IMO the card is worthy of the higher grade it can attain. The same is true for totally reconstructed or constructed cards. If technology can not identify these from genuine originals, then no difference exists. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Card restoration post | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 11-11-2007 01:38 PM |
Revealing Article on Card Restoration from 1988 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 10-29-2006 09:54 AM |
Card Restoration Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 05-11-2004 06:54 PM |
vintage card restoration/recolorization | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 02-09-2003 08:55 AM |
cabinet card restoration | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 09-02-2002 01:27 AM |