![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Gilbert Maines
I agree. One grade should reflect the state of preservation of the card, and the second should detail the adequacy of the manufacturing ie. intensity of color, contrast, focus, cutting irregularities, print lines, other manufacturing errors (including wrong player shown). These grades can be divided into decimal increments of 9.0 - 10.0 applied to unused cards, for example. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
When will Grading Card Co.'s Consider.. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 09-10-2007 09:51 AM |
Card Grading | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 10-23-2006 01:29 PM |
see, now this is why you do need card grading | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 06-29-2005 04:24 PM |
card grading | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 12-13-2004 10:16 AM |
Card grading | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 08-21-2002 08:58 PM |