 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9
10-10-2004, 04:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Lipset Auction -- Ruth Rookie Question
Posted By: Jay Miller
Todd--I would say the best bet for the Ruth rookie is a straight letter Gimbels. In fact, I think (but wouldn't swear) I saw one several years ago. Otherwise, if you have a Ruth with a back that could be an M101-4 or a M101-5 you cannot call it a rookie because you do not know definitively which year it is from. Makes all those PSA graded Ruth "rookies" with blank backs pretty suspect. Bob Lemke should put this info out in the SCD catalog and the info should be deseminated to the grading services so such misrepresentations can be avoided. Makes you wonder what PSA's liability is to people who paid up for high grade Ruth "rookies". 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Lipset Auction | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 04-29-2006 10:47 AM |
| 1923 Ruth Exhibit - Lipset Auction | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 03-30-2006 08:19 PM |
| Lipset Auction | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 04-23-2005 03:53 PM |
| RUTH "ROOKIE" IN MASTRO AUCTION | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 35 | 04-09-2004 11:03 AM |
| Obaks from Lipset Auction | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 11-08-2002 09:52 PM |
Threaded Mode