![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Howie
Cards with back damage regardless of what's on the back must have the damage taken into account when assigning an official technical grade. If you have two identical card fronts, one clean back and one damaged back, they can't be graded the same. In these cases the technical grading is meaningless to how the card should be priced. The act of slabbing was more for authentication than it was for grading. Educated buyers of a cards like the Mack and Robinson know this. Casual buyers passing them over because of the low grade number don't get it. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Do you display the back damage? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 12-25-2007 08:15 PM |
Back damage on 1915 Cracker Jacks | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 01-21-2007 06:38 PM |
T206 Cincinnati Cards Nice fronts with back damage | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 01-10-2007 06:21 AM |
Scrapbook damage and grading | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 08-31-2005 05:31 PM |
back damage to a Mayo | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 08-26-2004 07:13 AM |