 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5
05-16-2007, 07:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Always felt Ruth signed b/balls were kind of common and not very special
Posted By: Corey R. Shanus
Ruth being Ruth, his single-signed balls, perhaps common compared to other HOF single-signed balls, will always be special and always in demand. Perhaps an apt analogy would be a '51 Bowman or '52 Topps Mantle baseball card. By any stretch, I hardly think they can be called rare. Yet, being the preeminent postwar card, they will never be cheap. And when a true condition rarity shows up, the sky seems to be the limit in how much it will sell for. Same too for Ruth single-signed balls, arguably the most popular single-signed ball to be had. And when a true blazer surfaces, the demand to have (one of) the best will ensure continued astronomical prices. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Kind of OT ESPN Classic Babe Ruth Legends show | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 12-09-2008 07:52 PM |
| Looking to trade for 1962 Topps Ruth special cards | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 08-27-2008 09:29 AM |
| Does anyone know what kind of Babe Ruth card this is? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 11-26-2007 03:55 PM |
| Rose apology signed balls in REA- WITHDRAWN | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 38 | 09-25-2006 07:00 PM |
| Mastro Lots: HOF Single Signed Balls / Kalamazoo Bats Team Card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 12-18-2002 07:02 AM |
Threaded Mode