![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Michael Poland
I recently bought a Ty Cobb T206 and I am more certain than not that it is real but I have this sinking feeling it could be fake. I don't have fancy tools just a 10X loupe and I compared it to my other known authentic T206s. The black line around the image is solid, no dots. The name and team is a solid brown color. The back looks totally legitimate. The card stock looks and feels the same. If this is in fact a fake..it is DARN GOOD! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ben
Michael, that has to be the single largest scan of a card I've EVER seen. A reasonably sized scan would help alot in decifering whether or not your card is genuine. Until then I'll withhold any opinions on the matter. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Michael Poland
I apologize. I just thought the bigger I made it the more detail would be seen to help determine it. I reduced the size by half. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Rob L
I think you should contact David Rudd (hankron) regarding this card. He should have a pretty good idea on the printing of your card with the high res scans. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Elliot
Looks real to me. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jason
Looks real but definitely cut or trimmed. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Chris
Looks real to me. If I am not mistaken, don't reprints have much better registration? This card seems to have bad registration with the colors being misplaced. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Michael Poland
Thanks for the responses. I will be sending it off to SGC tomorrow(for my registry). I held it up to my other cards and it doesn't seem to be smaller than the rest. I surely hope it isn't trimmed. I do notice the bottom right corner seems a little cockeyed, hopefully that won't be an adverse factor. Thanks again. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: petecld
Card looks real but I hope you didn't pay a lot for it. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Elliot
Pete's right, the bottom quadrant has been skinned and then reglued on. However, I'm not sure the card has been trimmed.....I think it might just be a diamond cut. Plus the bottom right corner looks like it's been clipped. Toughest of the 4 Cobb cards in T-206, though. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Michael Poland
I wonder if this will keep it from getting slabbed? I know that SGC will not grade and slab it if they consider it rebuilt, restored or resurfaced. UGH!!!! |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: hankron
I didn't see the scans (I'm guessing it's the green background), but, even if trimmed and rough, I wouldn't think a T206 Cobb would be difficult to resell. Like the 1933 Goudey Ruth or Gehrig, it's one of the cards lots of people want. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fake T206 Cobb | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 11-22-2007 04:45 AM |
T206 Cobb PSA 6 EX-MT and Chase EX Graded *Scans Added* | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 4 | 11-19-2007 08:58 PM |
Another day....another fake T206 Cobb | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 09-10-2007 09:19 AM |
Cobb E95 Authenticity Opinion (large scans!) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 06-28-2006 07:01 AM |
t206 ty cobb is it real or fake | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 09-22-2005 06:56 PM |