![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jeff
Couldn't help but notice last night on the ebay live auction a Lajoie T206, PSA 7, was being auctioned by the PSA parent company and, even though it was off center, it didn't have a qualifier on it. Curious, because I have a PSA 8 (OC) Lajoie from the same set -- with the same exact offcentering. I wonder if they were selling my card instead of their own if I would have gotten a qualifier. My question is: having never submitted to PSA before, can you influence them in order to get higher grades; i.e., by submitting an entire set instead of just one card? Do they favor larger customers as such? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Chris
While I am not a heavy submitter of cards to PSA, it just seems to me that there does exist an inherent conflict of interest in terms of favoring larger collectors' submissions. While I don't claim to know all the revenue soucres for PSA's parent company, but grading submissions must be a large source of revenues. As such, it would appear it would be in PSA's benefit to ensure large collectors submitting cards to 'receive' higher grades. I have no evidence to support this, but one 'could' see this dynamic happen. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anonymous
Your card is a grade higher with the qualifier - many people ask for cards to be graded without a qualifier (at the highest grade possible w/o qualifier). You could ask PSA to review your card and see if they could grade it PSA 7 w/o qualifiers.+ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: murcerfan
perhaps the centering of the backs was at issue as well, how did they compare ? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brian H.
My belief (and I am hardly alone in this) is that over the years the grading standards at PSA (as well as SGC) have changed. Generally, the changes have amounted to stricter grading. I might also note that the actual graders -- even the "head graders" entrusted with evaluating vintage cards -- have changed as well. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jeff
Regardless, can PSA be influenced by those who submit hundreds of cards at a time? |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1953 Howell RC PSA 7 1961 DeJordy RC PSA 7 1965 Cheevers RC PSA 7.5 For Sale | Archive | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 0 | 01-15-2009 10:30 AM |
Politics, Religion, Economics and Guns | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 34 | 10-13-2008 04:27 PM |
FS-T207's Mullin No D PSA 6 (highest graded),McDonald PSA 6 (1 higher), Henry PSA 3 | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 12-03-2007 05:30 AM |